Respondent name
Victoria Johnson
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
DEV1
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Overestimates housing need.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
DEV4
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Lack of evidence to support anticipated no. of new jobs created. No plans for more diverse employment opportunities outside of distribution warehousing.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
GB1
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Green Belt release not justified, plan not demonstrated exceptional circumstances and does not maintain permanence of Green Belt. Loss of Green Belt will damage character and local distinctiveness. Green Belt Assessment fails to assess value as a whole. Negative impact on quality of life.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
INF1
Evidence Base

Transport for Quality of Life (TfQL) report 'The Impact of Road Projects in England' suggests new road schemes generate additional traffic, damage environment/landscape, have limited economic benefit to local economies.

Sound
No
Summary of comments

Scale of new infrastructure and distributor roads not necessary as plans for housing need/commercial development also excessive. Plan promotes excessive growth without certainty/viability of key infrastructure to support it. New road networks will increase traffic congestion and urban sprawl. Costs for new infrastructure underestimated - plan undeliverable. Infrastructure must be in place before new housing developments.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
INF4
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Does not demonstrate how new community infrastructure will be delivered. Proposals do not take into account need for new hospital. Community facilities need to be in place before further developments delivered.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
DC1
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Policy does not offer protection to valuable places and their distinct character.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
DC3
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Man-made alternatives will not sufficiently replace green spaces lost as a result of development. South Warrington - access to green space significantly reduced. Damage to biodiversity.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
DC6
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Policy not robust enough, does not look at cumulative effect of individual schemes on the area.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
ENV2
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Policy does not consider existing needs or implications of new development. Flooding already an issue.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
ENV8
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Councils aims regarding air pollution are sound, although contradicted by policies proposed. Plan will increase light pollution/noise pollution.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD2
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Excessive housing numbers proposed. Green Belt removal not in line with national policy. Poor Quality of Green Belt assessment undertaken. Lack of provision for infrastructure/community facilities. Increase in pollution.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD5
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Excessive housing numbers proposed. Green Belt removal not in line with national policy. Poor Quality of Green Belt assessment undertaken. Lack of provision for infrastructure/community facilities. Increase in pollution.