Respondent name
Natalie Belford (Manchester Airport Group)
Responses
Respondent Type
Statutory/prescribed body
Policy Name/Part of plan
INF6
Sound
Yes
Summary of comments

Strongly support policy INF6 and its inclusion in the Plan is justified, with the policy wording being robust and encompassing all aspects of Aerodrome safeguarding.

Respondent Type
Statutory/prescribed body
Policy Name/Part of plan
ENV7
Summary of comments

Welcome the requirement that is set out at paragraph 9.7.12 for wind energy proposals to demonstrate accordance with policy INF6.

Paragraph/policy sub

9.7.12

Respondent Type
Statutory/prescribed body
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD2
Summary of comments

Due to the scale of the proposed urban extension and associated infrastructure delivery, comprehensive transport improvements and extensive green infrastructure network that are to be delivered in relatively close proximity, and therefore accessibility, to Manchester Airport, this policy is off interest to us. Therefore, please ensure that we are consulted on the Development Framework that will be prepared for the South East Warrington Urban Extension.

Respondent Type
Statutory/prescribed body
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD6
Summary of comments

Although we don?t have any comments relating to the soundness of this policy, due to the proximity and potential relationship between Manchester Airport and the South East Warrington Employment Area, the delivery of this allocation is of high interest to us. Of most significance to us will be the potential impact on the strategic road network in the vicinity of Manchester Airport and implementation of new transport measures, including any mitigation measures that are required to offset any impact of traffic generated by the new employment site. We would therefore appreciate being consulted on the Development Framework that will address the detailed requirements of this policy.