Respondent name
David Williams
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
DEV1
Sound
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

The Plan has not been adapted to take into account the latest housing data.

Modification if applicable

The growth in housing numbers generated by the standard model are ?not a target? but a starting point, this starting point should be amended to reflect the 2018 ONS data.

Summary of comments

The case has not been made for the growth that is driving the increased housing numbers in the Plan. The 2018 ONS data predicts significantly lower growth for the town.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Exceptional Circumstances
Sound
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

The case that is made for the Green Belt release is not sound.

Modification if applicable

The priority of the Council should be renewal of the town centre and the development of brownfield sites not release of the Green Belt.

Summary of comments

The Green Belt boundaries were only confirmed 7 years ago. Releasing Green Belt immediately will divert investment from the regeneration of the town centre and the brownfield sites around the town.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD2
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Congestion and traffic is already a huge issue in Warrington with the existing numbers of people residing in the region. To build the numbers proposed without dramatic change to the infrastructure will simply lead to gridlock and will turn both people and business away from the area not encourage a flourishing and thriving local economy. The M6 is frequently a car park anyway and adding 4200 homes in the ?South East Warrington Urban Extension? with a likely extra approximately 10,000 cars is unlikely to improve the areas fluidity!

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD5
Sound
No
Summary of comments

The Thelwall Heyes site will contribute to creating a continuous suburb merging a number of suburbs and settlements. The village lifestyle will be transformed and lost forever.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD5
Sound
No
Summary of comments

There is no change in planned infrastructure regarding the Thelwall Heys development for access for another 310 houses so likely approximately 5-600 more cars. This is likely to cause significant rises in congestion along all surrounding access roads which are already congested.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD6
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Warrington Hospital already finds itself at breaking point and would require significant extra funding to be able to accommodate such vast numbers of extra people in the region. Nothing has been mentioned regarding this in the new proposal. I also see no proposals for other additional public services such as schools.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD6
Summary of comments

Thelwall Heys provides much needed drainage to the surrounding areas. Weaste Lane is already regularly flooded in the areas near the canal and this would only worsen, potentially flooding Thelwall as well.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD6
Sound
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

Air pollution has direct correlations with increase in health issues.

Summary of comments

Air pollution is already poor in the area with such volumes of HGVs passing through and around Warrington but the development of such vast expanses of commercial warehouses is likely to dramatically worsen the situation.