Objects to various areas of the whole plan and gives extensive reasoning in the corresponding letter of objection. Ending with: My view is that the most likely outcome of this plan as it is today would be:
1) the building of housing estates for the financial benefit of developers;
2) the building of low employment logistics facilities, again for the financial benefit of developers and the operational benefit of their users;
3) a failure to deliver integrated infrastructure improvements fit for the 21st century;
4) a failure to deliver educational, health, sport and community facilities;
5) an unsatisfactory level of revenue to WBC from business rates;
6) nothing that compensates for the loss of Green Belt, coupled with the very bad precedent of releasing Green Belt;
7) damage to the character of the area, and a degraded quality of life for many people.
This is all unsound.
Objects to various areas of the whole plan and gives extensive reasoning in the corresponding letter of objection. Ending with: My view is that the most likely outcome of this plan as it is today would be:
1) the building of housing estates for the financial benefit of developers;
2) the building of low employment logistics facilities, again for the financial benefit of developers and the operational benefit of their users;
3) a failure to deliver integrated infrastructure improvements fit for the 21st century;
4) a failure to deliver educational, health, sport and community facilities;
5) an unsatisfactory level of revenue to WBC from business rates;
6) nothing that compensates for the loss of Green Belt, coupled with the very bad precedent of releasing Green Belt;
7) damage to the character of the area, and a degraded quality of life for many people.
This is all unsound.