Council has not considered all reasonable alternatives for Green Belt release. Brownfield sites should be considered first. Loss of prime agricultural land . No Green Belt is required to meet housing needs. No need for more houses in Culcheth Glazebury and Croft. Good quality pensioner homes are needed. Failed duty to co-operate as residents not given enough time to comment. Green Belt important to preserve for surface water run off. sewerage infrastructure is at capacity. More homes will mean more flooding. No capacity in schools or medical centres. Too much traffic congestion.

Council has not considered all reasonable alternatives for Green Belt release. Brownfield sites should be considered first. Loss of prime agricultural land . No Green Belt is required to meet housing needs. No need for more houses in Culcheth Glazebury and Croft. Good quality pensioner homes are needed. Failed duty to co-operate as residents not given enough time to comment. Green Belt important to preserve for surface water run off. sewerage infrastructure is at capacity. More homes will mean more flooding. No capacity in schools or medical centres. Too much traffic congestion.

The opposition was only given a few days to read through over 700 pages of the plan before being asked to vote on it going to consultation. This document failed to have page numbering meaning cross-referencing was very difficult. The opposition party were only given a formal brief over one week after the consultation started. On the first day the website had some issues so did not have access to the plan. WBC were told they were omitting a large proportion of the population from this consultation, but they have failed to rectify that.