Respondent name
Mark Enderby
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Summary of comments

In summary, the plan is not -
Positively prepared ? as the strategy does not meet the area?s needs and is not consistent with sustainable development. The plan appears to be driven by growth of housing rather than growing the economy, employment opportunities and supporting infrastructure. This is clearly the wrong way round.
Justified ? as it does not take into account reasonable alternatives.
Effective ? while housing may well be delivered over the plan period, it is clear that the plan does not provide any confidence that the required infrastructure will materialise (if ever).