Respondent name
Louise Fernyhough
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
GB1
Summary of comments

Plan proposes too much Green Belt development in proportion to brownfield regeneration. Green Belt should be protected for future generations and to enhance health and wellbeing of residents.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD3
Summary of comments

Supports addition of Fiddlers Ferry site, however, more housing should be proposed for such a large site to reduce strain on Green Belt and villages across the Borough.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD5
Summary of comments

Site is high quality agricultural land and previously granted Special Landscape Character Status - development would change character/landscape of this site and should be avoided.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD2
Summary of comments

Lack of infrastructure to support scale of development - significant increase to already high volume of traffic in area.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD6
Summary of comments

Development previously rejected by Government. Site is high quality agricultural land and contains heritage asset - should not be developed. Congestion already an issue in area - development would amplify this. Greater focus needed on utilising many vacant industrial units in area before considering Green Belt release.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
INF1
Summary of comments

Plan provides little support to existing infrastructure - increase in housing will exacerbate current congestion issues.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Summary of comments

Plan offers limited protection for environment - loss of Green Belt, increased car journeys due to location of residential developments, thus adding to existing air quality issues. Plan is disappointing and sacrifices too much green land without providing innovative solutions to problems of area. Greater focus needed on Town Centre regeneration.