Plan not consistent with national climate change targets.

Infrastructure/services in area at capacity - questions how developers will help this. Additional residential development in area will therefore have a detrimental impact on travel, transport and safety within the village. No evidence of requirements for better than minimum environmental or energy efficiency measures in place - statement on developments built to highest levels of energy efficiency is misleading. Questions whether site is at risk of flooding.

Infrastructure/services in area at capacity - questions how developers will help this. Additional residential development in area will therefore have a detrimental impact on travel, transport and safety within the village. No evidence of requirements for better than minimum environmental or energy efficiency measures in place - statement on developments built to highest levels of energy efficiency is misleading. ENV7 says 10% of energy should be renewable or from low carbon source. This is wholly inadequate and does not correspond to "as energy efficient as possible".

This section mentions taking neighbouring developments into account yet there is no mention of the current and future developments going ahead in Carrington/Partington. This will put huge strain on existing road network.

Mentioning opportunities for links to the TPT is not a plan.

Policy states that Green Belt should be used only after brownfield sites are exhausted, however the local plan releases green field sites for rapid and immediate development - contradictory to Government policy.

Plan for town centre is meaningless if the largest release of land for development under the plan is the other side of MSC that effectively cuts off the development from the town centre.

Much of the development runs alongside green infrastructure/open space - negative impact on ecology.

Having a large employment area so far outside of Warrington makes active travel there difficult.