UPSVLP 0979
Respondent name
Adrian Sorsby
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD5
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Summary of comments
No commitment to brownfield regeneration within the plan - greater focus needed on town centre regeneration. WBC have not adequately promoted consultation.
Documents
Questions why site is now considered suitable for development when previously it was deemed unsuitable. Site is quality agricultural land, contains a listed building and other heritage assets and serves residents for leisure use. Development would alter the distinct character of local landscape and villages.