Respondent name
Adrian Sorsby
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD5
Summary of comments

Questions why site is now considered suitable for development when previously it was deemed unsuitable. Site is quality agricultural land, contains a listed building and other heritage assets and serves residents for leisure use. Development would alter the distinct character of local landscape and villages.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Summary of comments

No commitment to brownfield regeneration within the plan - greater focus needed on town centre regeneration. WBC have not adequately promoted consultation.