Respondent name
Matthew Sobic (St Modwen)
Responses
Respondent Type
Landowner/developer
Policy Name/Part of plan
Omission Site
Sound
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

The Plan cannot currently be considered ?sound? as it does not meet the tests included at Paragraph 35 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Modification if applicable

Allocate land located to the east of the M6 J21 and comprising areas to the north and south of the A57 Manchester Road for employment development.

Summary of comments

Various evidence and assessments submitted to support the land allocation requested. Land located to the east of the M6 J21 and comprising areas to the north and south of the A57 Manchester Road should be allocated for employment development. The land in question is available, under the control of St Modwen, is well placed to meet the gap in supply for Warrington's employment land needs and there are no known constraints that would prevent development of the site.

Respondent Type
Landowner/developer
Policy Name/Part of plan
EDNA
Sound
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

The Plan cannot currently be considered ?sound? as it does not meet the tests included at Paragraph 35 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Modification if applicable

Do not agree with the findings of the Council's EDNA 2021. Allocate land located to the east of the M6 J21 and comprising areas to the north and south of the A57 Manchester Road for employment development to meet the shortfall of employment land identified by Savills' study.

Summary of comments

Critique supplied by Savills with regards to the contents of the Council's 2021 EDNA Refresh and the methodology used to calculate the Council's Local Plan employment land provision and grading of potential allocation sites. Savills' study concludes that based on the evidence submitted, there is a shortfall of circa 194 hectares of employment land allocated in the Plan period by the Council. Therefore, further allocations are needed to meet the demand for B2/B8 land uses in the Plan period.

Respondent Type
Landowner/developer
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD3
Sound
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

The Plan cannot currently be considered ?sound? as it does not meet the tests included at Paragraph 35 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Modification if applicable

Allocate land located to the east of the M6 J21 and comprising areas to the north and south of the A57 Manchester Road for employment development.

Summary of comments

Do not consider this to be a realistic site to deliver employment development because of a lack of a delivery partner, costly and time consuming remediation, planning permission timeframes are too tight, significant enabling infrastructure is required, unrealistic build out rates and not in a prime location for Industrial and Logistics development.