UPSVLP 2001
Respondent name
Ken Roberts
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
OS6
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
Local infrastructure cannot cope, with extra demand.
Too many other proposed development very close by
Historical significance of the land
Environmental impact
Modification if applicable
Cancel the proposed development
Paragraph/policy sub
Waterworks Lane Development
Documents