UPSVLP 2019
Respondent name
Thomas O'Raw
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD4
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
It's not well advertised or discussed with local Residents, it has no input from local Residents whatsoever, and what input they have mentioned has been completely ignored, peel Hall is on there yet again even though their right to apply again was removed. Therefore it is non compliant with the duty to co-operate, nor is it legally compliant since we're democratic and the people's opinion has been ignored, and therefore it is not sound.
Documents