UPSVLP 2030
Respondent name
Richard Stead
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
OS2
Legally Compliant
Yes
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
Yes
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
There seems to be a bigger focus on the Duty to Cooperate than the impact on the environment with green belt ?shifted? to accommodate previous planning requests rather than investment to turn brownfield sites into housing instead.
Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate
Duty to cooperate seems to be the whole focus of this plan rather than the needs of Warrington Residents and workers.
Modification if applicable
Stop using green belt for developments
Paragraph/policy sub
10.7 Policy 17
Documents