UPSVLP 2058
Respondent name
Damien Ghee
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
OS6
Legally Compliant
Yes
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
Yes
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
With respect to the proposed developments at Waterworks Lane and Peel Hall, I feel that there is no plan proposed to manage the impact of the development on the existing infrastructure on the village of Winwick. I believe the infrastructure in Winwick is already straining - and will be strained further from the major development proposed at Parkside.
Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate
I am being asked to give my view at this time which should help shape the planning decisions made on the back of the Local Plan
Modification if applicable
Consider the road infrastructure through Winwick village - particularly the A49/Golbourne Road/Myddleton Lane. These roads already have heavy traffic around the local primary school, Residential housing, local shops and pub.
Paragraph/policy sub
10.12 Waterworks Lane and 10.4 Peel Hall
Documents