UPSVLP 2082
Respondent name
Carolynne Miller
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
Fails to predict growth accurately
Fails to protect green belt and green field sites
Fails to rejuvenate the town centre
Unfairly biased against south warrington
Huge environmental and ecological impact
Insufficient details of infrastructure
Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate
N/A
Modification if applicable
Reduce use of green belt and green field sites
Improve use of brown field sites
Provide up to date evidence of housing and employment site numbers required
Rejuvenate town centre to prevent people traveling to Manchester/ Liverpool to shop
Improve infrastructure
Protect environment and ecology
Protect the landscape and character of villages
Documents
Fails to predict growth accurately
Fails to protect green belt and green field sites
Fails to rejuvenate the town centre
Unfairly biased against south warrington
Huge environmental and ecological impact
Insufficient details of infrastructure