UPSVLP 2140
Respondent name
Sheila Gribben
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident of nearby Borough/area
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
Unsound by use of greenbelt as a preference to brownfield sites.
Lack of a proper assessment of environmental impact by loosing so much greenbelt in one particular location.
The area should be kept for agricultural.
Unsound by lack of thought given to local infrastructure and increased traffic in Appleton thorn areas.
Unsound by lack of proposed new infrastructure that would support any increase in traffic
Unsound by overdevelopment around existing villages and risk of loss of character.
Modification if applicable
Revise plans to use so much greenbelt land.
Documents