Respondent name
Fiona Brown
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
Yes
Sound
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

As a Resident of South Warrington (Grappenhall) I am already living with schools that are crowded and over subscribed and roads which are already very congested.
The new Local Plan does not include any new crossings over the Manchester Ship Canal or Bridgewater canal and the existing crossings over the Ship \Canal are in a very poor state of repair,
The number of houses planned is excessive and will completely destroy some beautiful countryside and only add to the congestion in the area. Adding a Logistics function - Six56 is an absolute nonsense on an already congested route to, and entrance to and from, the motorway network - M6 and M56 junction 20.

Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate

Apologies Yes added in error and I was not able to correct.

Modification if applicable

Reduce the number of houses planned, size of the developments, and reconsider Six56 development. Rather develop on brownfield sites in and around Warrington town centre and north of the town - Sankey and Birchwood with more suitable road networks.
I

Documents
UPSVLP-2169-Redacted.pdf (89.63 KB)