UPSVLP 2189
Respondent name
Dale Fullerton-Batten
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
There is no justification for predicted growth. THere is no need for the volume of housing and mass of employment land. There is no justification for scale of Green Belt release. There is no need for the harm to air quality and local ecology. There is no need to destroy the landscape and character of our villages. There is no clarity on the means of delivery. There is no explanation of how the already poor transport infrastructure of south warrington can cope with increased traffic.
Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate
I've marked no to all as I'm not sure and I don't want my lack of knowledge on whether this is legally compliant to stop me sharing how I feel about the plan.
Documents