UPSVLP 2257
Respondent name
Sport England
Responses
Respondent Type
Group/organisation
Policy Name/Part of plan
INF5
Sound
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
The SFSNA 2014 appears out of date and under review. PPS and this strategy not listed as key evidence or contained in the evidence base
Modification if applicable
references made to the strategies added to the evidence base and a plan for review, update of the SFSNA.
Respondent Type
Group/organisation
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD3
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
MD3.1 involves the loss of playing field, this should be protected or replaced as part of the development along with that necessary to meet the demands of the development. The playing field should be protected or replaced in accordance with Sport England policy and NPPF para 99.
Paragraph/policy sub
MD3.1
Respondent Type
Group/organisation
Policy Name/Part of plan
INF2
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
Possible impact on playing field plan 1 Warrington East Multi Modal corridor
Modification if applicable
Confirm no impact or advise of mitigation for impact in accordance with Sport England Playing field policy and NPPF para 99
Paragraph/policy sub
Part 2
Respondent Type
Group/organisation
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Sound
No
Documents
See other reasons above.