Respondent name
David Knight
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
Yes
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
Yes
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

As Residents of South Warrington we that the current infrastructure is unable meet current demands I.e
Doctors/hospital
Public transport
Leisure facilities
Road network.
Access across Ship Canal

Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate

Not having legal background we have to trust that WBC have implemented all requirements.

Modification if applicable

Significant reduction in the number of proposed houses. Reduced number should make provision for single owner affordable housing. Commitment to provide doctors ( not highlight a space on a plan ).
Better public transport.
Review of CURRENT travel times of emergency services during peak hours from north to south Warrington and then extrapolate to model the increase in demand the new proposals would give.
Funding to leisure facilities to match those in north Warrington.

Documents
UPSVLP-2263-Redacted.pdf (84.52 KB)