UPSVLP 2275
Respondent name
Carl Chadwick
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
GB1
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
How can this plan be legally compliant when the government have said all brownfield sites must be taken into account before destroying what little countryside Warrington has left.
Modification if applicable
All green belt sites are to be protected and every possible brownfield site is explored and advertised ahead of it
Documents