UPSVLP 2351
Respondent name
Curtis Milne
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
Local transport cannot support growth in south warrington
No justification for predicted growth
No need to harm local air and ecology
Destroys current landscape and ruins character of surrounding villages
No clarity on delivery
Modification if applicable
Provide solutions for the above
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
No justification for land growth
No need for volume of housing
No justification for green belt release
Harms local air quality
Destroys landscape and character of villages
No clarity on delivery
SOuth warringotn transport cannot support this
Modification if applicable
Review and solve the above to become a Sound plan
Documents