Respondent name
Grace Goodlad
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
GB1
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

Greenbelt land should not be built up on. It is there for protection of our future generations. As a child, this is unfair. Our house is surrounded by fields and cows and we have many walkers pass by. That will disappear if The council question and destroy such gift.

Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate

The plan is unsound and I do not support it.

Modification if applicable

Ban all development on greenbelt
Review brownfields sites and opportunities until they are exhausted.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD2
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

Having met with councils I understand the plan in detail. There are many errors and it is simply unsound.
Warrington has a traffic problem. The infrastructure is broken and needs fix before any such consideration for development.
Greenbelt should be protected at all costs.

Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate

Focus development on brownfield sites and negate development on greenbelt. Given climate concerns, our greenbelt should be given protection.

Modification if applicable

Remove greenbelt proposals
Review housing number requirements
Hear government national policy first.

Documents
UPSVLP-2437-Redacted.pdf (87.69 KB)