Respondent name
Gavin Faulkner
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
INF1
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

The transport infrastructure currently in place is already under strain and cannot cope, the local plan as a whole has very vague information and it is clear that housebuilding will happen at a pace and before the transport issues have been developed / resolved. The reasoning behind 4.23 is wholly flawed, whereby "Growth for Residential zones has been applied incrementally, thus preserving locally observed
trip rates and applying these to new housing development". This fails to address the problem that the new housing is going to attract far more Residential vehicles than the existing housing which is established and close to existing infrastucture. New housing can not be assessed by preserving existing locally observed trip rates. This is just one example of an ill conceived idea which will massively distort the local transport systems.

Modification if applicable

A detailed plan for transport must be prepared using realistic figures for the new housing and trips required for what are likely to be often 2 car households with commuters to Liverpool and Manchester. if this were done properly it would be clear that this number of houses cannot be supported without major investment in transport ahead of the building of houses.

Paragraph/policy sub

4.23