UPSVLP 2456
Respondent name
Ian Wilson
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
Yes
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
Yes
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
The plan is not sound.
There is no justification for future growth.
There is no need for the amount of housing to be built, or the amount of employment land to be used.
There is no justification for the amount of green belt land to be sacrificed.
There is no justification for the creation of urban sprawl.
Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate
I accept the argument that it is legally compliant, and that it is compliant.
Modification if applicable
The land to be used where Fiddlers Ferry power station lies should be dedicated to housing, and should have no employment use.
The amount of land to be used for housing in Appleton, Appleton thorn, and Grappenhall should be scaled back considerably.
Documents