UPSVLP 2461
Respondent name
Barrie Whittam
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
Yes
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
Soundness It is not changed enough from the original plan.
It is based on excessive growth rate and unrealistic delivery.
It does not clearly prioritise Brown Field land over Green Belt land.
Road and Social infrastructure are inadequate for the scale of this plan.
Duty to cooperate - I do not feel that enough has been done to the plan in light of objections already raised by the Residents of Warrington.
Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate
Legally compliant - I am not a Lawyer but assume that you are not acting illegally
Modification if applicable
The plan needs scaling back to use realistic growth and delivery rates.
Infrastructure issues must be detailed more precisely within the plan.
There must be clear prioritisation of Brown Field site use before using the Green Belt land.
Documents