UPSVLP 2467
Respondent name
Paul Gifford
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
Many reasons why this plan is floored including but not limited to use of current countryside and lack of forward planning for the local infrastructure
Modification if applicable
Consider other areas eg fiddlers ferry site etc
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
Don?t believe the local objections have been fully heard or addressed
Why you support the legal compliance or soundness of the Draft Local Plan or its compliance with the duty to co-operate
Issue with the floored plan due to building on current countryside and lack of additional infrastructure to support the growth in housing and Residents
Modification if applicable
Consider alternative sites eg fiddlers ferry
Documents