Respondent name
Chartered Institute of Logistics & Transport
Responses
Respondent Type
Group/organisation
Policy Name/Part of plan
DEV4
Legally Compliant
Yes
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
Yes
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

It fails to address the needs of Warrington, the North West and the UK for freight transport and logistics in a Net Zero decarbonised future

Modification if applicable

The Plan should address future needs for decarbonised freight transport and logistics by siting major warehousing and distribution developments at rail-connected sites, or those which can be rail-connected at reasonable cost. Locating such developments at sites which can only be served by road is unsound and does not comply with Government objectives to decarbonise transport. There is no viable option for trunk haulage by HGV in a decarbonised manner - modal switch to electric rail is the future for trunk haulage, with short-range battery trucks for local/regional distribution from regional hubs. In the North West, the key hubs need to be located in the Warrington/Wigan area. The proposed distribution complex close to the M6/M56 junction is completely unsustainable, since it cannot be rail-connected and would be reliant on road transport for all movements. Port Warrington is an ideal site for a Strategic Rail Freight Interchange (SRFI) and should be reinstated to the Local Plan. The brownfield Fiddlers Ferry power station site offers an alternative which is operationally less efficient, since it involves at least one train reversal at Arpley (two for trains arriving from the North or East), but has good on-site rail facilities and ample flat land for the construction of warehouses and an intermodal terminal.