Respondent name
Mr Peak
Responses
Respondent Type
Landowner/developer
Policy Name/Part of plan
OS5
Legally Compliant
Yes
Sound
Yes
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
Yes
Oral Examination
Yes
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

The land is identified for allocation under draft Policy OS5 ? Lymm (Rushgreen Road) for a residential led mixed-use development providing a minimum of 136 new homes and a health facility. We can confirm that our client?s section of the proposed allocation is available for development in the short term. The site is available and suitable for residential development, and we fully support the proposed allocation.

Summary of comments

The development of the site would represent a logical rounding of the urban area. The site is not physically constrained by flood risk, ecological issues or topography and has good access to Thirlmere Drive to the west and the surrounding highway network. The site is highly sustainable within walking distance of the centre of Lymm and is well related to local infrastructure, amenities, schools and convenience stores. We can confirm that the site is available and suitable for residential development. Removal of the land at Watercress Farm from the Green Belt would not harm the purposes of the Green Belt and would provide deliverable residential development which would contribute towards the Borough's housing requirement in the short term. We fully support the proposed allocation under draft Policy OS5. It is not proposed for the existing property and its garden to be included within the proposed allocation. However, the existing property (edged blue on the location plan enclosed) would be removed from the Green Belt within the new local plan as its garden curtilage would be bounded by the allocation and the existing settlement of Lymm. We support this proposed amendment.

Respondent Type
Landowner/developer
Policy Name/Part of plan
GB1
Legally Compliant
Yes
Sound
Yes
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
Yes
Oral Examination
Yes
Summary of comments

Support the amendment of Green Belt boundary associated with Policy OS5.