UPSVLP 2506
Respondent name
leslie roy Canning
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
DEV1
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
No justification for predicted growth figures or for the scale of green belt release.
No need for the volume of housing and no clarity of the means of delivery.
No explanation of how the existing poor transport infrastructure can cope with increased levels of traffic.
No need to alter the landscape and character of our villages
Documents