UPSVLP 2524
Respondent name
David Forster
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate
The questions assumes the complainant has a legal background and is able to understand the 'legal speak' in the documentation. I feel this prejudices the 'normal person in the street'.
Modification if applicable
As with previous submissions of the Local Plan, I an vehemently opposed to any development planned on Green Belt land.
Documents