Respondent name
Malcom Fernyhough
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Sound
No
Summary of comments

No. of proposed new houses is high in relation to future population estimates. Smaller villages could lose identity due to scale of development proposed. Road infrastructure in area is insufficient and unable to cope with further development. Plan does little to protect environment and move towards being carbon neutral.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
GB1
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Green Belt should be protected from development - brownfield sites should be used first. Green Belt supports wellbeing of residents.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD3
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Use of area should be maximised and the number of houses increased to reduce the need for Green Belt release across the Borough.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD5
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Development in area will ruin landscape and change the nature of the area. Currently used by residents for relaxation and exercise - development should be avoided.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD6
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Site uses too much Green Belt and is likely to affect traffic flow due to its close proximity to the motorway. Existing under-utilised industrial sites should instead be developed.

Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD2
Sound
No
Summary of comments

Too many houses proposed - will saturate area. Too much Green Belt development, too many additional cars, positioned too close to already congested motorway network - not a good idea.