Respondent name
Mrs P Derbyshire
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
Whole Plan
Summary of comments

Suggests those behind recent developments in the area are motivated by greed rather than ethics. Questions whether there is proof that proposed developments are required. Existing issues with congestion in the area. Suggests that the area has become a dormitory town with no sense of community. Questions provision of facilities and essential infrastructure. Social infrastructure for young people needs greater consideration and should be within walking distance from residential developments. Irritancy at Peel Holdings for failing to maintain swing bridges and lock gates.