Respondent name
Warrington RUFC and Grappenhall Tennis Club
Responses
Respondent Type
Group/organisation
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD2
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
Yes
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

There is no clarity on the development plan around the impact on our sports grounds, including vehicle access, parking and drainage are of a particular concern.
We have not received any communication from WBC during the planning phase and neither has our governing body, the Lawn Tennis Association.
We are also very concerned about the acmes and parking to our sports grounds whilst construction is taking place.

Modification if applicable

The current plan would have a detrimental affect on our site drainage.The drainage from our site has no additional capacity and we believe run off from the development would need to run through our site which is a major concern.
The additional congestion will make Stockton Lane potentially dangerous for our members, especially on foot and on bikes.
The sustainable travel options do not look like they would benefit our members accessing our facilities.
We would like to see a cycle route along Stockton Lane, Pedestrian access from Chester Road and additional parking which is already over capacity as many club member have to park on Stockton Lane at busy periods.

Summary of comments

The impact of development in the SEWUE on the two clubs' facilities has not been considered. Concerns also about increased traffic congestion, air quality and poor drainage infrastructure. Loss of countryside feel around the club. Reliance upon existing crossings over/under the Bridgwater Canal are insufficient to support the proposed development which are already problematic on match days. Concerns about the construction period and impact on the club. Interested in further dialogue with WBC regarding improvments to the club to provide enhanced facilities alongside the new developemnt proposed.

Paragraph/policy sub

10.2