Respondent name
Janice Searl
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD4
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Oral Examination
No
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

10.4.2 the development is not sustainable. This site is landlocked and was acknowledged during the 2018 and 2020 Public Inquiries. The housing planned would only be accessed by car and minimal levels of cycling.
10.4.4 is unsound, the development has not been designed to support walking and cycling for local trips. The surrounding road networks will be substantially busier and therefore more dangerous.
10.4.5 is unsound the development will cause huge pressure on the facilities in north Warrington. The planning applications have not addressed in detail how the problems will be mitigated.
10.4.6 At the Public Inquiries in 2018 and 2020 the measures proposed by the developer were insufficient to mitigate the substantial problems that this development would cause.
MD4.3 paragraph24 unsound A development of the size planned will undoubtedly introduce vehicular activity into the existing surrounding neighbourhoods which would change the character of these established Residential areas, to their detriment which was acknowledged by the 2018 Public Enquiry.

Modification if applicable

Peel Hall should be removed from the Local Plan.
The site is unsuitable for development. Over the past 30 years the site has been considered and rejected due to it being landlocked. Any development there would cause huge problems to an already problematic road network in this area.
The local Residents deserve to be heard and allowed to enjoy the last remaining green space in this part of Warrington.

Paragraph/policy sub

10.4.2
10.4.4
10.4.6
MD4.3

10.4.6