Respondent name
Anthony Gallagher
Responses
Respondent Type
Resident
Policy Name/Part of plan
MD2
Legally Compliant
No
Sound
No
Compliant with the Duty to Co-operate
No
Oral Examination
Yes
Why you consider the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant or is unsound or fails to comply with the duty to co-operate

1. Road network plan is not sufficient to support the proposed plan on top of the already consented planning that is yet to complete .
2. Lymm interchange already at capacity
3. Stretton interchange at capacity
4. A49 Stockton Heath significantly congested - Major pollution from standing traffic - Required pollution study ??
5. Stockton Heath does not have sufficient parking for volume of new homes proposed 6. Staffing of new Doctors surgeries ?- building is no problem but shortage of Staff is acute - Query CCG input from NHS ??Compliance .
7.Protection required for Grappenhall village and surrounding Residential roads from Barleycastle employees using as a ?Rat Run? require access only on Broad Lane - safety
8. For Stockton Lane , crossing of Canal needs to be scoped out properly before compliance can be deemed as legal .
9. Council needs to address use of Greenbelt versus use of Brown field sites for multi level living

Modification if applicable

1. Revision required in full for SE Extension and Thelwall Heys
2. Address proportionality wrt distribution of new housing throughout borough.
3. A workable transport plan and NOx pollution reduction plan is required to be legally compliant .
4. Warrington Residents do NOT wish to live in a city .

Paragraph/policy sub

Page 12